July 7th, 2016
Why not give kids assistive tools for speech? Why do we think this is a problem? Lots of people think that if kids are using tools such as Proloquo they will not learn to speak "normally", but among other things this denies the fact that there are many valid ways to communicate and not all involve oral communication. If the point is to get kids to communicate their needs and wants with us, does it matter in what way they do so?
We expect all our neurotypical and abled students to learn greater and greater independence. That's the point of teaching. We are preparing them for life after school. We need to seek the same goals for our students who have disabilities, too!
It feels like we're further along than Day 3. We're busy working on our Proloquo board, and while it's a great tool we're finding the set-up a bit frustrating. How do we move folders around the board? What actions and words are necessary,and which ones are superfluous? I can see why this should be a team set-up project; I could not imagine doing this effectively all on my own. It's great to have a partner to work with.
No comments:
Post a Comment